Monad’s Launch Shows How FDV Can Mislead When Markets Turn Risk Off

Monad’s MON token arrived on the market at a moment when confidence in crypto was already shaky. Bitcoin had just slid from around 120,000 dollars to below 85,000 dollars in the weeks before the listing, pulling risk appetite down across the board. Even so, MON debuted with a fully diluted valuation of about 3.2 billion dollars, driven not by roaring demand but by a very thin circulating supply that magnified the headline number.  

At launch, just over 10.8 billion MON were available to trade, roughly 10 percent of the 100 billion total supply set out in Monad’s tokenomics. With that small float, almost any price near the public sale range was enough to lock in a multibillion dollar FDV. Earlier on, traders on prediction platform Polymarket had even toyed with the idea of an 8 billion dollar outcome before flipping sharply bearish as bitcoin fell. In both directions, many participants seemed to treat FDV as if it were a direct gauge of demand rather than a simple formula that multiplies total supply by spot price.  

The debut exposed how easily low float launches can distort expectations. With so much of the supply locked, small moves in MON’s price translated into massive changes in implied valuation, even though underlying liquidity stayed shallow. At the same time, traders were focused on other pressure points, including slow token sale momentum, a sizable allocation to the team and investors, and the risk that airdrop recipients could sell into the market. Those concerns showed up in sentiment and in prediction odds, yet the structure of the float meant FDV was unlikely to fall far unless the token traded well below its sale band.  

For longer term holders, the bigger issue is what happens as locked tokens begin to unlock through 2026 and beyond. A launch that starts with only a tenth of supply in circulation leaves plenty of room for dilution, and that future expansion is not captured by the rosy headline FDV that appears on day one. Analysts following the listing have used MON as a case study in why FDV can become an optical illusion in low float environments. The number looks impressive on dashboards, yet it says more about engineered scarcity than about real capital committed to the asset.  

Monad’s debut has quickly turned into a reference point for the current cycle. It highlights the gap that can open up between market mood and basic supply math when bitcoin is volatile and token launches are built around delayed unlocks. The lesson for traders is that FDV forecasts can break down when they ignore how little is actually trading, and that careful reading of distribution schedules and float size matters at least as much as watching prediction markets or macro headlines.  

‍